Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44391 - 44400 of 68502 for did.
Search results 44391 - 44400 of 68502 for did.
State v. Robert W. Wilcoxson
. Wilcoxson contends that he could not be resentenced because the State did not seek resentencing as a remedy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11466 - 2005-03-31
. Wilcoxson contends that he could not be resentenced because the State did not seek resentencing as a remedy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11466 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was a party to the crimes testified she did not know Jackson and could not identify him on sight. Jackson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123549 - 2017-09-21
was a party to the crimes testified she did not know Jackson and could not identify him on sight. Jackson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123549 - 2017-09-21
Duane G. Carpenter v. Ronald J. Buelow
, the bartender did and said nothing to calm the situation. Carpenter again told Teschke that he had no business
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13970 - 2005-03-31
, the bartender did and said nothing to calm the situation. Carpenter again told Teschke that he had no business
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13970 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Washington v. Steven R. Schmit
offense.… Since the court determines that the legislature did not authorize two convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2127 - 2017-09-19
offense.… Since the court determines that the legislature did not authorize two convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2127 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
did not comply with Wis. Stat. § 893.82 (2007-08),[1] the notice of claim statute. We affirm.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36763 - 2009-06-15
did not comply with Wis. Stat. § 893.82 (2007-08),[1] the notice of claim statute. We affirm.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36763 - 2009-06-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to “shock public sentiment.” See Ocanas, 70 Wis. 2d at 185. The court did not consider improper factors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158094 - 2017-09-21
to “shock public sentiment.” See Ocanas, 70 Wis. 2d at 185. The court did not consider improper factors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158094 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Michelle Frank v. James Fritz
of material fact and that they did not know or have reason to know that their son was likely to use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12375 - 2017-09-21
of material fact and that they did not know or have reason to know that their son was likely to use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12375 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
precedent at the time the blood draw was obtained, the circuit court did not err in denying Morton’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110417 - 2017-09-21
precedent at the time the blood draw was obtained, the circuit court did not err in denying Morton’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110417 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counts. The parties did not agree to make any specific recommendations with respect to disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132066 - 2017-09-21
counts. The parties did not agree to make any specific recommendations with respect to disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132066 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State of Wisconsin ex. rel. Bryce Garrett v. Gerald Berge
Garrett that he had ten days from the date of the memo to appeal the suspension. However, Garrett did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6488 - 2017-09-19
Garrett that he had ten days from the date of the memo to appeal the suspension. However, Garrett did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6488 - 2017-09-19