Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44391 - 44400 of 90596 for the law non slip and fall cases.

State v. William T. Ackerman
arrest was valid presents a mixed question of fact and law. The trial court’s findings on disputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11637 - 2005-03-31

Daniel J. Lorge v. Randy Finger
nothing to do with the case. The Lorges explained that “it shows he should know the law.” The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21519 - 2006-03-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
connection exists between his crime and the victims’ injuries. Under the particular facts of this case, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961611 - 2025-05-28

[PDF] State v. William T. Ackerman
. Whether Ackerman’s arrest was valid presents a mixed question of fact and law. The trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11637 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Daniel J. Lorge v. Randy Finger
, and testimony that were necessary to their case. We evaluate the circuit court’s conduct of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21519 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
are multiplicitous because they are identical in both law and fact, and the legislature did not intend cumulative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830224 - 2024-07-23

[PDF] Jeffrey L. Woodson v. Marie E. Kreutzer
that (1) the jury's findings were contrary to law and the weight of the evidence, (2) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9823 - 2017-09-19

State v. Dion C. Mitchell
in this case shows that Mitchell had “knowledge of the elements of” first-degree recklessly endangering safety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6225 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
numerous errors of law. We reject these claims and affirm. Background ¶2 Following a bench trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=339180 - 2021-03-02

[PDF] John Bettendorf v. St. Croix County
establishes that “the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Id. ¶8 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26294 - 2017-09-21