Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4441 - 4450 of 24666 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Total Biaya Bangun Saung Kayu Jati Sederhana WIlayah Laweyan Solo.

[PDF] State v. Patrick C. Webster
consolidated for sentencing. Webster received consecutive sentences totaling sixteen years on several counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13368 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Deborah A. Schumaker v. Howard D. Schumaker
of the remaining combined total. The resulting award of $1,200 per month to Deborah was to begin six months
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16127 - 2017-09-21

Dolores Demir v. Ahmet Demir
, occasional groceries and clothes totaling more than $100,000. He believed that a “new contract” existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9731 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and objective, and is viewed in light of the totality of the circumstances. State v. Walli, 2011 WI App 86
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173182 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
and sexual assault charges and was sentenced to consecutive terms totaling fifteen years’ initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36086 - 2014-09-15

CA Blank Order
total exceeded the maximum length permitted by statute. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115651 - 2014-07-01

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that its decision was intended to provide Paul with sixty percent of the parties’ total income
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813303 - 2024-06-19

CA Blank Order
on the sexual assault of H.A.K., and concurrent terms of probation on the remaining offenses totaling fifteen
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106647 - 2014-01-13

COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable under the totality of the circumstances.[3] Ballenger pled guilty to operating with a prohibited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56707 - 2010-11-15

Deborah K. Deforth v. Gary L. Deforth
award was invalid and excessive because the court never determined the total value of the marital assets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25547 - 2006-06-14