Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4441 - 4450 of 29763 for des.
Search results 4441 - 4450 of 29763 for des.
[PDF]
George Parker v. Arthur Jones
decision, our review of summary judgment is de novo. See id. at 315, 401 N.W.2d at 820. When “asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14765 - 2017-09-21
decision, our review of summary judgment is de novo. See id. at 315, 401 N.W.2d at 820. When “asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14765 - 2017-09-21
Johnny Larry v. David W. Schwarz
this court decides de novo, benefiting from the administrative agency's analysis. See State ex rel. Parker v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10254 - 2005-03-31
this court decides de novo, benefiting from the administrative agency's analysis. See State ex rel. Parker v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10254 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
-Moss Act. ¶7 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment, employing the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29517 - 2014-09-15
-Moss Act. ¶7 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment, employing the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29517 - 2014-09-15
State v. Romell Quin
is more appropriately reviewed under a de novo standard. The State contends that because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13962 - 2005-03-31
is more appropriately reviewed under a de novo standard. The State contends that because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13962 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
To: Hon. Martin J. De Vries Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Lynn M. Hron Clerk of Circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564260 - 2022-09-09
To: Hon. Martin J. De Vries Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Lynn M. Hron Clerk of Circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564260 - 2022-09-09
COURT OF APPEALS
follows. ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87751 - 2012-10-09
follows. ¶15 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87751 - 2012-10-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
standard or de novo.” Id. We adopt that approach here, and conclude that under either standard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768452 - 2024-02-27
standard or de novo.” Id. We adopt that approach here, and conclude that under either standard
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768452 - 2024-02-27
City of Milwaukee v. Clifton Hampton
the Milwaukee County Circuit Court for a trial de novo, which the trial court granted. Hampton then filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9084 - 2005-03-31
the Milwaukee County Circuit Court for a trial de novo, which the trial court granted. Hampton then filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9084 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Green v. Sherrie L. Zuber
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See County of Jefferson v. Renz, 222 Wis.2d 424
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15075 - 2017-09-21
presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See County of Jefferson v. Renz, 222 Wis.2d 424
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15075 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
earlier is a question of law” that we review de novo. Romero-Georgana, 360 Wis. 2d 522, ¶30. Lee
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738911 - 2023-12-12
earlier is a question of law” that we review de novo. Romero-Georgana, 360 Wis. 2d 522, ¶30. Lee
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=738911 - 2023-12-12