Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4441 - 4450 of 69076 for he.

State v. Roosevelt Bennett
jumping, and providing false information on a firearms-dealer notification form.[1] He appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4902 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 18, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appea...
. Anthony argues he is entitled to a new trial because the circuit court made several evidentiary errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50177 - 2010-05-17

State v. Michael J. Bielefeldt
of conviction of second-degree sexual assault, false imprisonment and battery. He also appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2858 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
child and incest. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion seeking a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58854 - 2011-01-18

[PDF] State v. Michael J. Bielefeldt
. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Bielefeldt argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2858 - 2017-09-19

State v. Christopher L.
this claim on his further argument that “[t]he law is clear and unambiguous, a court can order a juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13015 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
his negligence claims against John and Debbie Buckmaster and Pierce Lewis. Anthony argues he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50177 - 2014-09-15

City of Oshkosh v. John Daggett
guilty of violating the Oshkosh municipal ordinance regarding lead hazard reduction. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20856 - 2006-01-10

[PDF] State v. Christopher Hamilton
relief. He argues: (1) that the trial court erred when it refused to declare the victim, D.S., whom he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14204 - 2014-09-15

State v. James Chinavare
intentionally disobeyed the permanent injunction and, therefore, he was in contempt of the court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2753 - 2005-03-31