Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4441 - 4450 of 68869 for he.
Search results 4441 - 4450 of 68869 for he.
State v. Christopher Hamilton
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues: (1) that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14204 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues: (1) that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14204 - 2005-03-31
City of Oshkosh v. John Daggett
guilty of violating the Oshkosh municipal ordinance regarding lead hazard reduction. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20856 - 2006-01-10
guilty of violating the Oshkosh municipal ordinance regarding lead hazard reduction. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20856 - 2006-01-10
State v. Marshall R. Reese
(2) (2001–02). He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Reese
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20870 - 2006-01-09
(2) (2001–02). He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Reese
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20870 - 2006-01-09
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 18, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appea...
. Anthony argues he is entitled to a new trial because the circuit court made several evidentiary errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50177 - 2010-05-17
. Anthony argues he is entitled to a new trial because the circuit court made several evidentiary errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50177 - 2010-05-17
State v. Michael D. Sarnowski, Jr.
that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury's guilty verdict. Sarnowski also claims that he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10478 - 2005-03-31
that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury's guilty verdict. Sarnowski also claims that he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10478 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and incest. He also appeals from an order denying his No. 2010AP127-CR 2 postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58854 - 2014-09-15
and incest. He also appeals from an order denying his No. 2010AP127-CR 2 postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58854 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by a felon. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion, in which he argued that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977155 - 2025-07-01
by a felon. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion, in which he argued that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977155 - 2025-07-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and “dismiss the plea bargain that [he] was persuaded into by [his] attorney.” The State Public Defender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86027 - 2014-09-15
and “dismiss the plea bargain that [he] was persuaded into by [his] attorney.” The State Public Defender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86027 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on Fifth Amendment grounds, however he did not take any subsequent steps to obtain a ruling regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=327937 - 2021-01-26
on Fifth Amendment grounds, however he did not take any subsequent steps to obtain a ruling regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=327937 - 2021-01-26
[PDF]
State v. Mack McClinton
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues: (1) No. 98-1909-CR 2 the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14222 - 2014-09-15
denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues: (1) No. 98-1909-CR 2 the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14222 - 2014-09-15