Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44411 - 44420 of 74838 for judgment for us.
Search results 44411 - 44420 of 74838 for judgment for us.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
motion requesting that the circuit court amend the judgment of conviction to vacate the DNA surcharge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977902 - 2025-07-02
motion requesting that the circuit court amend the judgment of conviction to vacate the DNA surcharge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977902 - 2025-07-02
[PDF]
State v. James Gulley
4 Furthermore, there could be no prejudice even if the judgment of conviction did erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15238 - 2017-09-21
4 Furthermore, there could be no prejudice even if the judgment of conviction did erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15238 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
court entered judgment on the jury’s verdict in favor of Shaw in the amount of $16,376.24 plus costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74952 - 2011-12-07
court entered judgment on the jury’s verdict in favor of Shaw in the amount of $16,376.24 plus costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74952 - 2011-12-07
Michael R. Luterbach v. Denise M. Luterbach
on the motion. Patulski's appellate argument does not persuade us that the trial court lacked jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9672 - 2005-03-31
on the motion. Patulski's appellate argument does not persuade us that the trial court lacked jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9672 - 2005-03-31
Kerry D. Severson v. Donald Gudmanson
was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented the committee’s will and not its judgment; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13039 - 2005-03-31
was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented the committee’s will and not its judgment; and (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13039 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Eckert separately resolved the 2017 charges. Those matters are not before us. No. 2018AP2056
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240972 - 2019-05-17
that Eckert separately resolved the 2017 charges. Those matters are not before us. No. 2018AP2056
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240972 - 2019-05-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
pronouncement and a written judgment, the oral pronouncement controls.” State v. Ortiz, 2001 WI App 215, ¶27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983337 - 2025-07-16
pronouncement and a written judgment, the oral pronouncement controls.” State v. Ortiz, 2001 WI App 215, ¶27
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983337 - 2025-07-16
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, Badger Mutual Insurance, in the amount of $100,000. Attorney Mitz promptly used a portion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139097 - 2017-09-21
, Badger Mutual Insurance, in the amount of $100,000. Attorney Mitz promptly used a portion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139097 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
both the judgment of conviction and the order denying sentence modification. See State v. Storzer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48243 - 2010-03-22
both the judgment of conviction and the order denying sentence modification. See State v. Storzer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48243 - 2010-03-22
COURT OF APPEALS
permission, while Berg remained in Colorado. Corddry docketed the parties’ Colorado divorce judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76403 - 2012-01-17
permission, while Berg remained in Colorado. Corddry docketed the parties’ Colorado divorce judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76403 - 2012-01-17