Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44431 - 44440 of 82649 for case codes/1000.
Search results 44431 - 44440 of 82649 for case codes/1000.
State v. James H. Lindvig
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10302 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10302 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing factors during the reconfinement hearing. This appeal follows. DISCUSSION ¶7 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44278 - 2009-12-07
sentencing factors during the reconfinement hearing. This appeal follows. DISCUSSION ¶7 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44278 - 2009-12-07
State v. Darrell J. Shearer
that the defendant has committed the offense. There is evidence in this case certainly that the -- [officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3739 - 2005-03-31
that the defendant has committed the offense. There is evidence in this case certainly that the -- [officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3739 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
After Nationstar entered the case, the parties litigated the pending motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138244 - 2015-03-23
After Nationstar entered the case, the parties litigated the pending motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138244 - 2015-03-23
[PDF]
WI APP 99
2013 WI APP 99 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP2041
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99929 - 2017-09-21
2013 WI APP 99 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2012AP2041
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99929 - 2017-09-21
State v. Steven W. Biever
scenarios could be permissible. Accordingly, we will review the case law on this issue. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15983 - 2005-03-31
scenarios could be permissible. Accordingly, we will review the case law on this issue. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15983 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the conviction to enhance his sentence in a future criminal case, and (2) failed to explain to Bethel that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33184 - 2014-09-15
of the conviction to enhance his sentence in a future criminal case, and (2) failed to explain to Bethel that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33184 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in a prior case.3 2 At the conclusion of his no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131836 - 2017-09-21
in a prior case.3 2 At the conclusion of his no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131836 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
its case in the court. ¶7 Accordingly, on October 11, 2011, the circuit court entered a written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91764 - 2014-09-15
its case in the court. ¶7 Accordingly, on October 11, 2011, the circuit court entered a written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91764 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
subsequently granted foreclosure. Rauscher now appeals. ¶3 This case involves the admissibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101638 - 2013-09-09
subsequently granted foreclosure. Rauscher now appeals. ¶3 This case involves the admissibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101638 - 2013-09-09