Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44441 - 44450 of 64561 for b's.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. JEFFREY B. VAN GOETHEM AND SHERILYN VAN GOETHEM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=278767 - 2020-08-18

COURT OF APPEALS
, with the use of a dangerous weapon, in violation of Wis. Stat. §§ 940.01(1)(a) and 939.63(1)(b) (2011-12).[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93377 - 2013-02-27

[PDF] WI 95
had violated former SCR 20:1.7(b)5 by continuing his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41756 - 2014-09-15

[PDF]
, 131 Wis. 2d at 262; see also WIS. STAT. § 971.08(1)(b) (requiring the court to “make such an inquiry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=851816 - 2024-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the following the factors: (a) “[t]he likelihood of the child’s adoption after termination”; (b) the child’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=946231 - 2025-04-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and disadvantages of accepting or refusing medication. See § 51.61(1)(g)4.a.-b. Our supreme court explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=629754 - 2023-03-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
trial. B. Evidence of Gang Activity ¶29 Mays next argues that the circuit court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617626 - 2023-02-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
” to understand what was happening, he responded he could “mostly” just hear “[b]its and pieces[.]” ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=708375 - 2023-10-04

State v. Daniel R. F.
. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] Wisconsin Stat. § 971.01(1) reads: The district attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3235 - 2005-03-31

State v. Edward F. Ramos
not erroneously exercise its discretion in admitting the postmortem photographs of Brandon. B. Other acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14578 - 2005-03-31