Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44451 - 44460 of 57351 for id.
Search results 44451 - 44460 of 57351 for id.
Fariba Baylis v. State
that the defendant not commit a crime under the criminal laws of any jurisdiction.[5] See id. The statute therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15486 - 2005-03-31
that the defendant not commit a crime under the criminal laws of any jurisdiction.[5] See id. The statute therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15486 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Darian L. Hall
under and exigent circumstances. See id. The probable cause standard is a familiar one. A police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12476 - 2017-09-21
under and exigent circumstances. See id. The probable cause standard is a familiar one. A police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12476 - 2017-09-21
State v. Wa Thao Lor
in the outcome. Id. at 642, 369 N.W.2d at 719. No defendant is guaranteed a right to a perfect trial. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10555 - 2005-03-31
in the outcome. Id. at 642, 369 N.W.2d at 719. No defendant is guaranteed a right to a perfect trial. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10555 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
witness rather than the testimony of another is to be believed is conclusive.” Id. at 637. ¶19 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=537060 - 2022-07-07
witness rather than the testimony of another is to be believed is conclusive.” Id. at 637. ¶19 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=537060 - 2022-07-07
State v. Renee D.
exercised its discretion. Id. Here, this standard was satisfied. ¶9 In 1995, Bobby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5846 - 2005-03-31
exercised its discretion. Id. Here, this standard was satisfied. ¶9 In 1995, Bobby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5846 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Lee Raven
that these attorneys performed deficiently. See id. at 804. ¶8 Next, Raven challenges the accuracy of a portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25262 - 2017-09-21
that these attorneys performed deficiently. See id. at 804. ¶8 Next, Raven challenges the accuracy of a portion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25262 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
of discretion. Id. at 587. A challenge to the court’s exercise of discretion would be frivolous. Mark also
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141397 - 2015-05-12
of discretion. Id. at 587. A challenge to the court’s exercise of discretion would be frivolous. Mark also
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141397 - 2015-05-12
Elaine A. Ray v. Town of Kinnickinnic
and either correct itself or make a ruling that this court could then review. See id., ¶12. We decline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7651 - 2005-03-31
and either correct itself or make a ruling that this court could then review. See id., ¶12. We decline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7651 - 2005-03-31
Roxana Derus v. Garlock, Inc.
that was drawn by the jury. Id. at 305-06, 347 N.W.2d at 598. Garlock first contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7857 - 2005-03-31
that was drawn by the jury. Id. at 305-06, 347 N.W.2d at 598. Garlock first contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7857 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Edward Hutchinson
the discretion to deny the motion without an evidentiary hearing. See id. at 309-10. Because we have already
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14741 - 2017-09-21
the discretion to deny the motion without an evidentiary hearing. See id. at 309-10. Because we have already
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14741 - 2017-09-21