Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44461 - 44470 of 83713 for case search.
Search results 44461 - 44470 of 83713 for case search.
State v. Robert J. Barnes
in the preconviction treatment program. Based upon the record in this case, we do not dispute that Barnes’ failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13395 - 2005-03-31
in the preconviction treatment program. Based upon the record in this case, we do not dispute that Barnes’ failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13395 - 2005-03-31
State v. Carl P. Fike
, that this is not an instructional error but an error of the wrong fact-finding entity adjudicating guilt, other case law supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8980 - 2005-03-31
, that this is not an instructional error but an error of the wrong fact-finding entity adjudicating guilt, other case law supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8980 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
” for failing to previously raise this issue was the recent case law requiring consideration of the guidelines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51218 - 2014-09-15
” for failing to previously raise this issue was the recent case law requiring consideration of the guidelines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51218 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
in this case establish that service by certified mail to the attorney general’s capitol office never occurs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139402 - 2015-04-06
in this case establish that service by certified mail to the attorney general’s capitol office never occurs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139402 - 2015-04-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059263 - 2026-01-13
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059263 - 2026-01-13
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93566 - 2013-03-05
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93566 - 2013-03-05
State v. Kenneth Moffett
of the right to a jury trial requires the use of a personal colloquy in every case where a criminal defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5200 - 2005-03-31
of the right to a jury trial requires the use of a personal colloquy in every case where a criminal defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5200 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶6 Regarding Mayan’s arguments relating to the admittance of evidence at trial, Wisconsin case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28503 - 2014-09-15
. ¶6 Regarding Mayan’s arguments relating to the admittance of evidence at trial, Wisconsin case law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28503 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
because it was a close case and the prosecutor’s final rebuttal argument, reminding the jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27091 - 2006-11-13
because it was a close case and the prosecutor’s final rebuttal argument, reminding the jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27091 - 2006-11-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238306 - 2019-03-27
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238306 - 2019-03-27