Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44491 - 44500 of 84254 for case number.
Search results 44491 - 44500 of 84254 for case number.
[PDF]
NOTICE
have raised on direct appeal. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2 In Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44702 - 2014-09-15
have raised on direct appeal. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2 In Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44702 - 2014-09-15
State v. Douglas G. Skenandore
and sentenced him accordingly. ¶6 The facts in this case are undisputed; however, as the State points out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4410 - 2005-03-31
and sentenced him accordingly. ¶6 The facts in this case are undisputed; however, as the State points out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4410 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John R. Martin
. Before Vergeront, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. PER CURIAM. These appeals arise from six cases which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11306 - 2017-09-19
. Before Vergeront, Roggensack and Deininger, JJ. PER CURIAM. These appeals arise from six cases which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11306 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Pell Lake Sanitary District No. 1 v. Vicki View
of the Petersons’ motion. ¶2 The pertinent facts in this case are brief. In February 2004, the Sanitary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19352 - 2017-09-21
of the Petersons’ motion. ¶2 The pertinent facts in this case are brief. In February 2004, the Sanitary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19352 - 2017-09-21
2011 WI APP 54
2011 WI app 54 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1359 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61123 - 2011-05-08
2011 WI app 54 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1359 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61123 - 2011-05-08
[PDF]
State v. Elaine Veasley
need be addressed). No. 95-0417-CR -3- The issue in this case is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8636 - 2017-09-19
need be addressed). No. 95-0417-CR -3- The issue in this case is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8636 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
Statutes require the State to prove the case for an initial commitment beyond a reasonable doubt. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93170 - 2013-02-20
Statutes require the State to prove the case for an initial commitment beyond a reasonable doubt. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93170 - 2013-02-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 2d 92, 96, 352 N.W.2d 673 (Ct. App. 1984). In this case, T.C.B.’s mother, N.S., testified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191689 - 2017-09-21
. 2d 92, 96, 352 N.W.2d 673 (Ct. App. 1984). In this case, T.C.B.’s mother, N.S., testified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191689 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370363 - 2021-05-25
Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370363 - 2021-05-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768590 - 2024-02-27
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768590 - 2024-02-27