Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4451 - 4460 of 40298 for Antique 💥🏹 antiquewolrd.com 💥🏹 antique news 💥🏹 clean antique 💥🏹 antique brass 💥🏹 antiqueworld.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that he is entitled a new trial in the interest of justice because the real controversy in this matter
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581349 - 2022-10-25

[PDF] State v. Juergen Huebner
is whether Huebner may assert Hansford’s invalidation of § 756.096(3)(am) as a ground to get a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14429 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
that a new factor, namely inaccurate information on the amount of cocaine found, warranted sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47252 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jonathan Moen
) as a ground to get a new trial. He may not. Accordingly, we affirm. As noted, Hansford held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14943 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Postconviction, he challenged his sentence on two bases: the sentence was harsh and unconscionable and a new
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190154 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Brook E. Grzelak
granting his motion for sentencing modification. Although the circuit court determined that a “new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15835 - 2017-09-21

State v. Larry Cook
modification. He contends that the trial court erred when it determined that no new factor existed which could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9132 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
his postconviction motion for a new trial based on newly discovered recantation evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000973 - 2025-08-26

[PDF] Kenneth Urman v. Brian Barron
and a judgment setting aside a jury verdict, ordering a new trial in the interest of justice and dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4176 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
modification on the grounds of a new factor under State v. Harbor, 2011 WI 28, ¶40, 333 Wis. 2d 53, 797 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192128 - 2017-09-21