Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4451 - 4460 of 68466 for did.
Search results 4451 - 4460 of 68466 for did.
State v. Devin D. Lenoir
) the prosecutor failed to timely disclose the status of the prosecution against his accomplice, (4) the State did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12625 - 2005-03-31
) the prosecutor failed to timely disclose the status of the prosecution against his accomplice, (4) the State did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12625 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas J. Miller
, this motion did not challenge the warrantless seizure of his blood by the police following his arrest. Rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3659 - 2005-03-31
, this motion did not challenge the warrantless seizure of his blood by the police following his arrest. Rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3659 - 2005-03-31
Richard Lee Winter v.
Winter to conduct a scheduled telephone conference. Attorney Winter did not return the referee's call
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17006 - 2005-03-31
Winter to conduct a scheduled telephone conference. Attorney Winter did not return the referee's call
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17006 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
makes the same arguments on appeal. Because we conclude the State did not violate the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190467 - 2017-09-21
makes the same arguments on appeal. Because we conclude the State did not violate the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190467 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
James Kasieta v. James Tennies
the disputed property for the required twenty years. We conclude that they did not, and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3398 - 2017-09-19
the disputed property for the required twenty years. We conclude that they did not, and therefore affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3398 - 2017-09-19
State v. Richard L. Verkler
. Verkler declined to submit to this test, saying he did not believe in it. He was arrested for OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5335 - 2005-03-31
. Verkler declined to submit to this test, saying he did not believe in it. He was arrested for OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5335 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
again, and picked it back up. He did this at least four times. When ML stated that he did not want
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982962 - 2025-07-16
again, and picked it back up. He did this at least four times. When ML stated that he did not want
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982962 - 2025-07-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was driving while revoked. Schultz told Hall that he did not pull over immediately because he was “just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948799 - 2025-04-29
was driving while revoked. Schultz told Hall that he did not pull over immediately because he was “just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948799 - 2025-04-29
COURT OF APPEALS
support floor provision did not violate public policy. The circuit court refused to modify Michael’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102554 - 2013-10-07
support floor provision did not violate public policy. The circuit court refused to modify Michael’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102554 - 2013-10-07
[PDF]
State v. Brandy C. Arneson
is controlling. Under Gaulrapp, the arresting officer did not “seize” Arneson when he asked for consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4157 - 2017-09-20
is controlling. Under Gaulrapp, the arresting officer did not “seize” Arneson when he asked for consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4157 - 2017-09-20