Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44561 - 44570 of 57596 for id.

State v. Gordon A. Alexander
before sentencing, "freely" does not mean "automatically." Id. The defendant must offer some reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10117 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
basis against the total days imposed in the consecutive sentences. Id. at 100. ¶7 Boettcher bars
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110526 - 2014-04-21

Pamela Jones v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
outside the ambit of that discretion when it bases its discretionary decision upon an error of law. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19587 - 2005-09-12

[PDF] Kelly J. McKinstry v. Marvin J. Kramer
specifically reserves claims against all other persons.” Id. at 450, 388 N.W.2d at 928. It is not clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11223 - 2017-09-19

Town of La Prairie v. Mule Hill Materials & Nursery, Inc.
there are no disputed issues of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Id., ¶24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18311 - 2005-05-25

[PDF] Harold E. Taves v. Michael T. Sullivan
). Six months is the general deadline for certiorari review, see id., and Taves waited more than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12968 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Olivia M. Caviale
of the offense into the statute. Id. The complaint correctly cited the substantive criminal statute, § 346.63
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9336 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Gary K. Augustine v. Douglas Makos
entered into is a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 264, 528 N.W.2d at 499. It is undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9983 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Patrick C. Webster v. David J. Kratochwill
with such certainty that nothing remains for judgment or discretion." Id. at 10-11, 546 N.W.2d at 156. Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9917 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
] attention[.]” Id. at 213-14. More succinctly, it is a “writ of error directed to a court for review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=618565 - 2023-02-07