Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44561 - 44570 of 76886 for judgment for u s.
Search results 44561 - 44570 of 76886 for judgment for u s.
State v. Arthur W. Sanger, Jr.
.’s motion to suppress evidence based on a lack of probable cause to arrest for operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5330 - 2005-03-31
.’s motion to suppress evidence based on a lack of probable cause to arrest for operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5330 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Court of Appeals Annual Report - 2004
% 68% 69% 67% Criminal 71 87 77 113 348 Percentage 37% 35% 32% 31% 33% %s of Disposition
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29 - 2017-09-20
% 68% 69% 67% Criminal 71 87 77 113 348 Percentage 37% 35% 32% 31% 33% %s of Disposition
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Frontsheet
1 ¶11 SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, J. (dissenting). I write in dissent in several attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158270 - 2017-09-21
1 ¶11 SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, J. (dissenting). I write in dissent in several attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158270 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to it. Not later than 5 days after certification under this section or under s. 973.20(10)(b), the municipality
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209004 - 2018-02-26
to it. Not later than 5 days after certification under this section or under s. 973.20(10)(b), the municipality
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209004 - 2018-02-26
COURT OF APPEALS
, but without subsection (f)’s requirement of payments “at least equal to the amount of unpaid court-ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35462 - 2009-02-09
, but without subsection (f)’s requirement of payments “at least equal to the amount of unpaid court-ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35462 - 2009-02-09
COURT OF APPEALS
DISTRICT IV State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Daniel S. Iverson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123499 - 2014-10-08
DISTRICT IV State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Daniel S. Iverson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123499 - 2014-10-08
COURT OF APPEALS
This court “independently review[s] the ‘legal issues arising in the context of a petition for habeas corpus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98825 - 2013-07-01
This court “independently review[s] the ‘legal issues arising in the context of a petition for habeas corpus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98825 - 2013-07-01
COURT OF APPEALS
that “reasonably convey[s] the information required for parties to prepare their defense and make their objections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145364 - 2015-07-30
that “reasonably convey[s] the information required for parties to prepare their defense and make their objections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145364 - 2015-07-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Howard B. Eisenberg, Post-Conviction Remedies in the 1970’s, 56 MARQ. L. REV. 69, 79 (1972). Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749271 - 2024-01-09
Howard B. Eisenberg, Post-Conviction Remedies in the 1970’s, 56 MARQ. L. REV. 69, 79 (1972). Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749271 - 2024-01-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS
% Criminal 155 119 94 87 455 Percentage 50% 50% 37% 31% 42% %s of Disposition: Affirmed Reversed
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92875 - 2014-09-15
% Criminal 155 119 94 87 455 Percentage 50% 50% 37% 31% 42% %s of Disposition: Affirmed Reversed
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92875 - 2014-09-15