Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44561 - 44570 of 59688 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 44561 - 44570 of 59688 for quit claim deed/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 FINE, J. W. Jean McCoy-Garner appeals, pro se, a small-claims judgment entered against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35583 - 2009-02-17
. ¶1 FINE, J. W. Jean McCoy-Garner appeals, pro se, a small-claims judgment entered against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35583 - 2009-02-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to be that he does not owe the claimed amount of support because the arrearage was created by the actions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=838540 - 2024-08-15
to be that he does not owe the claimed amount of support because the arrearage was created by the actions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=838540 - 2024-08-15
Iola Vision v. Paul Vermeern
. Iola Vision Center filed a small claims action against Vermeern and Melum, alleging that they owed $329
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10780 - 2005-03-31
. Iola Vision Center filed a small claims action against Vermeern and Melum, alleging that they owed $329
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10780 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in which he claimed to be intoxicated. Pfaff entered into a plea agreement with the State under which he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471017 - 2022-01-12
in which he claimed to be intoxicated. Pfaff entered into a plea agreement with the State under which he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471017 - 2022-01-12
[PDF]
John A. Lulloff v. David Schwarz
revocation hearing, although he claims that the agent, capitalizing on Lulloff’s poor vision, misled him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7483 - 2017-09-20
revocation hearing, although he claims that the agent, capitalizing on Lulloff’s poor vision, misled him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7483 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Jerry P. Koenig v. John H. Ahrens
cannot stipulate to facts and then claim that they need additional evidence to No(s). 98-1121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13911 - 2014-09-15
cannot stipulate to facts and then claim that they need additional evidence to No(s). 98-1121
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13911 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
motorist while driving the moped, his widow and estate filed claims under both policies, seeking to stack
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95194 - 2014-09-15
motorist while driving the moped, his widow and estate filed claims under both policies, seeking to stack
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95194 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
forfeited the right to raise other nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed violations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=915839 - 2025-02-19
forfeited the right to raise other nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed violations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=915839 - 2025-02-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claimed violations of constitutional rights. See State v. Kelty, 2006 WI 101, ¶18 & n.11, 294 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611590 - 2023-01-18
claimed violations of constitutional rights. See State v. Kelty, 2006 WI 101, ¶18 & n.11, 294 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611590 - 2023-01-18
[PDF]
Libbie Pesek v. Lincoln County General Relief Agency
controversy exists. A justiciable controversy is one in which a claim of right is asserted against one who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9130 - 2017-09-19
controversy exists. A justiciable controversy is one in which a claim of right is asserted against one who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9130 - 2017-09-19