Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44561 - 44570 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 44561 - 44570 of 58340 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
credibility, the trial court acting as the fact finder is the final arbiter. See Noll v. Dimiceli’s, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114853 - 2017-09-21
credibility, the trial court acting as the fact finder is the final arbiter. See Noll v. Dimiceli’s, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114853 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Alan Mains v. St. Mary's Hospital of Superior
conclude that the trial court reasonably exercised its discretion by dismissing the claim for Mains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3298 - 2017-09-19
conclude that the trial court reasonably exercised its discretion by dismissing the claim for Mains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3298 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice because the real No. 2011AP2481 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90570 - 2014-09-15
is entitled to a new trial in the interest of justice because the real No. 2011AP2481 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90570 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
misinterpreted testimony by his trial counsel about the extent to which Gronseth and his counsel discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253589 - 2020-02-06
misinterpreted testimony by his trial counsel about the extent to which Gronseth and his counsel discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253589 - 2020-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, “[r]egardless of the extent of the trial court’s reasoning, we will uphold a discretionary decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177102 - 2017-09-21
, “[r]egardless of the extent of the trial court’s reasoning, we will uphold a discretionary decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177102 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
when it failed to advise Wolfe of mandatory minimums, and whether trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102775 - 2013-10-08
when it failed to advise Wolfe of mandatory minimums, and whether trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102775 - 2013-10-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
.1 Megan Mathews appeals a judgment convicting her, after a jury trial, of operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46366 - 2014-09-15
.1 Megan Mathews appeals a judgment convicting her, after a jury trial, of operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46366 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on Mulikin’s vehicle. Accordingly, the motion alleged that Mulikin’s trial attorney was constitutionally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705857 - 2023-09-26
on Mulikin’s vehicle. Accordingly, the motion alleged that Mulikin’s trial attorney was constitutionally
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705857 - 2023-09-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the no-merit report discusses whether T.C. could pursue an arguably meritorious claim that his trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760113 - 2024-02-06
, the no-merit report discusses whether T.C. could pursue an arguably meritorious claim that his trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760113 - 2024-02-06
State v. Shawn D. Duley
and imprudent speed, the State sought the imposition of criminal penalties. See § 343.44(2)(e)1. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12240 - 2005-03-31
and imprudent speed, the State sought the imposition of criminal penalties. See § 343.44(2)(e)1. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12240 - 2005-03-31