Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44571 - 44580 of 98503 for court records search online.
Search results 44571 - 44580 of 98503 for court records search online.
State v. Jeffrey C. Miller
. Miller argues that the court gave too much weight to his prior criminal record and his pending battery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12001 - 2005-03-31
. Miller argues that the court gave too much weight to his prior criminal record and his pending battery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12001 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey C. Miller
that the court gave too much weight to his prior criminal record and his pending battery charge. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12001 - 2017-09-21
that the court gave too much weight to his prior criminal record and his pending battery charge. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12001 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Robert Robinson v. City of Milwaukee
(reopening). 1 We affirm an exercise of discretion if the trial court relies on facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7343 - 2017-09-20
(reopening). 1 We affirm an exercise of discretion if the trial court relies on facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7343 - 2017-09-20
Robert Robinson v. City of Milwaukee
of discretion if the trial court relies on facts of record and the appropriate legal standards to reach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7343 - 2005-03-31
of discretion if the trial court relies on facts of record and the appropriate legal standards to reach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7343 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey C. Miller
that the court gave too much weight to his prior criminal record and his pending battery charge. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12002 - 2017-09-21
that the court gave too much weight to his prior criminal record and his pending battery charge. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12002 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103416 - 2013-10-28
and has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103416 - 2013-10-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
OFFICE OF THE CLERK WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS 110 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 215 P.O
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375334 - 2021-06-09
OFFICE OF THE CLERK WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS 110 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 215 P.O
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375334 - 2021-06-09
Laura K. Waterhouse v. Thomas A. Waterhouse
Waterhouse’s child support payment records.[1] The court determined the agency was barred by the doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18094 - 2005-05-09
Waterhouse’s child support payment records.[1] The court determined the agency was barred by the doctrine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18094 - 2005-05-09
CA Blank Order
District IV August 28, 2014 To: Hon. Kenneth W. Forbeck Circuit Court Judge 51 S. Main Street
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120664 - 2014-08-27
District IV August 28, 2014 To: Hon. Kenneth W. Forbeck Circuit Court Judge 51 S. Main Street
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120664 - 2014-08-27
[PDF]
WI APP 99
2014 WI APP 99 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2013AP1844
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121227 - 2014-11-11
2014 WI APP 99 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2013AP1844
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121227 - 2014-11-11