Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44591 - 44600 of 82576 for judgment for m s.
Search results 44591 - 44600 of 82576 for judgment for m s.
State v. Michael A. DeLain
. The court of appeals affirmed a judgment of conviction, as well as an order denying post-conviction relief
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17911 - 2005-05-02
. The court of appeals affirmed a judgment of conviction, as well as an order denying post-conviction relief
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17911 - 2005-05-02
State v. Waylon Picotte
Clerk of Supreme Court APPEAL from a judgment and order of the Circuit Court for Brown County
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16566 - 2005-03-31
Clerk of Supreme Court APPEAL from a judgment and order of the Circuit Court for Brown County
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16566 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer
. APPEALS from judgments and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7994 - 2005-03-31
. APPEALS from judgments and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7994 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“realistically would like rights taken from [the father] but know[s] that most likely won’t happen.” ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1080247 - 2026-02-19
“realistically would like rights taken from [the father] but know[s] that most likely won’t happen.” ¶15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1080247 - 2026-02-19
R.A. Nielsen v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
). ¶8 In contrast to the ALJ’s conclusions of law, the Board declared that “Dr. Nielsen[’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14226 - 2005-03-31
). ¶8 In contrast to the ALJ’s conclusions of law, the Board declared that “Dr. Nielsen[’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14226 - 2005-03-31
R.W. Docks & Slips v. State
). "[S]ummary judgment is proper where there are no genuine issues of material fact and the moving party
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17563 - 2005-03-31
). "[S]ummary judgment is proper where there are no genuine issues of material fact and the moving party
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17563 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer
. APPEALS from judgments and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7995 - 2005-03-31
. APPEALS from judgments and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7995 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey W. Holzemer
. APPEALS from judgments and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7994 - 2017-09-19
. APPEALS from judgments and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7994 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Marinette County: JAMES A. MORRISON, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078712 - 2026-02-17
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Marinette County: JAMES A. MORRISON, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078712 - 2026-02-17
[PDF]
R.W. Docks & Slips v. State
). "[S]ummary judgment is proper where there are no genuine issues of material fact and the moving
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17563 - 2017-09-21
). "[S]ummary judgment is proper where there are no genuine issues of material fact and the moving
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17563 - 2017-09-21