Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4461 - 4470 of 29916 for des.
Search results 4461 - 4470 of 29916 for des.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Our review of a circuit court’s decision granting summary judgment is de novo. Hardy v. Hoefferle
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250828 - 2019-11-27
. Our review of a circuit court’s decision granting summary judgment is de novo. Hardy v. Hoefferle
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250828 - 2019-11-27
[PDF]
State v. Gordon Dain
a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. See Nottelson v. DILHR, 94 Wis.2d 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13809 - 2014-09-15
a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. See Nottelson v. DILHR, 94 Wis.2d 106
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13809 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Steven H. Hoyme v. Janice S. Brakken
Hoyme in person, through a third person or in any way whatsoever. Brakken requested a de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5444 - 2017-09-19
Hoyme in person, through a third person or in any way whatsoever. Brakken requested a de novo hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5444 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. William F. Jorgensen
the defendant present questions of law, which we review de novo. Id. The defendant has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6647 - 2017-09-20
the defendant present questions of law, which we review de novo. Id. The defendant has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6647 - 2017-09-20
Johnny Larry v. David W. Schwarz
this court decides de novo, benefiting from the administrative agency's analysis. See State ex rel. Parker v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10254 - 2005-03-31
this court decides de novo, benefiting from the administrative agency's analysis. See State ex rel. Parker v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10254 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conduct constitutes a taking is a question of law that we review de novo. E-L Enters., 326 Wis. 2d 82
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062623 - 2026-01-15
conduct constitutes a taking is a question of law that we review de novo. E-L Enters., 326 Wis. 2d 82
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062623 - 2026-01-15
[PDF]
First National Bank v. Manfred Wernhart and Beth Wernhart
of law the appellate court decides de novo. State Bank v. Arndt, 129 Wis.2d 411, 416, 385 N.W.2d 219
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10270 - 2017-09-20
of law the appellate court decides de novo. State Bank v. Arndt, 129 Wis.2d 411, 416, 385 N.W.2d 219
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10270 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Richard R. Rayburn v. MSI Insurance Company
or denial of summary judgment de novo and apply the same standards as the trial court. Brownelli v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2400 - 2017-09-19
or denial of summary judgment de novo and apply the same standards as the trial court. Brownelli v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2400 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ralph F. Beilke
on April 10, 1992. The trial court denied Beilke’s motion, concluding that the error was de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12155 - 2017-09-21
on April 10, 1992. The trial court denied Beilke’s motion, concluding that the error was de minimis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12155 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Razzie Watson, Sr.
the requirements of § 973.12(1) is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Theriault, 187 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4456 - 2017-09-19
the requirements of § 973.12(1) is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Theriault, 187 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4456 - 2017-09-19