Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4461 - 4470 of 63639 for records/1000.
Search results 4461 - 4470 of 63639 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
as “Payback,” the detective consulted the Kenosha police department records under the name “Payback” and found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56128 - 2010-11-02
as “Payback,” the detective consulted the Kenosha police department records under the name “Payback” and found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56128 - 2010-11-02
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95891 - 2014-09-15
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95891 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was coerced and his sentence is excessive. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170539 - 2017-09-21
was coerced and his sentence is excessive. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170539 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
police department records under the name “Payback” and found a record linking White to that name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56128 - 2014-09-15
police department records under the name “Payback” and found a record linking White to that name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56128 - 2014-09-15
State v. Anthony Lee Tucker
for the denial of Tucker’s requests. ¶2 According to the appellate record, Tucker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6602 - 2005-03-31
for the denial of Tucker’s requests. ¶2 According to the appellate record, Tucker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6602 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175029 - 2017-09-21
to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175029 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Phillip Ries
of the defendant. The defendant must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9620 - 2017-09-19
of the defendant. The defendant must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9620 - 2017-09-19
01-14 Amendment of SCR 70.245, 71.01, 71.04 regarding court reporters (Effective 07-01-02)
pursuant to 71.04 (9) (b) is not the official record. Section 4. 71.04 (6) of the Supreme Court Rules
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=959 - 2005-03-31
pursuant to 71.04 (9) (b) is not the official record. Section 4. 71.04 (6) of the Supreme Court Rules
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=959 - 2005-03-31
Baron L. Walker, Sr. v. Daniel Bertrand
waived his procedural claims of error, and that the record supports his adjudication of guilt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13550 - 2005-03-31
waived his procedural claims of error, and that the record supports his adjudication of guilt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13550 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116859 - 2014-07-14
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116859 - 2014-07-14