Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44601 - 44610 of 82649 for case codes/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
: “Once a justifiable stop is made—as is the case here—the scope of the officer’s inquiry, or the line
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61685 - 2011-03-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
explanation is necessary … will vary from case to case.” Id., ¶39. ¶7 Citing Gallion, Borowitz argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108601 - 2017-09-21

Luis Santana v. Jeffrey P. Endicott
2006 WI App 13 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP332 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20592 - 2006-01-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
into Atwater’s case prior to his guilty plea. Atwater also seeks plea withdrawal in the interest of justice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=588824 - 2022-11-10

[PDF] WI APP 21
2014 WI APP 21 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2013AP1108-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106334 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
explained that Kinsley had directed them not to do so. Early on in the case, the defense’s focus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197979 - 2017-10-18

COURT OF APPEALS
hearing. In addition, we know of no case law requiring such arrangements to be written. As McAlister
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41241 - 2009-09-22

[PDF] WI App 30
2018 WI App 30 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2016AP2413
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211390 - 2018-09-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
separate criminal cases.1 He argues the circuit court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594255 - 2022-11-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court meet constitutional standards. Id. DISCUSSION ¶6 The dispositive issue in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220388 - 2018-10-04