Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44601 - 44610 of 70054 for hi.

State v. Ronald V. McCallum
. Ronald McCallum appeals an order denying his motion to withdraw his Alford[1] plea to one count of second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9139 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
for a building site. ¶3 Since acquiring his lot in 1975, Desbrow has used and maintained a driveway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32911 - 2008-06-02

[PDF] State v. David S. Stenklyft
served 75 percent of the initial confinement portion of his sentence, we conclude that his petition
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18504 - 2017-09-21

United Airlines, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
) and his deplanement in Madison (finally discharged by the air carrier at airports everywhere
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14364 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - September 2008
a 120-mile radius of Waunakee, Donald Anderson would not permit his name to be used by any competing
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33965 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Gary Hanson v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Company
of $150,000. Hanson’s damages, however, exceeded this limit and he sought coverage under his Prudential UIM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4788 - 2017-09-19

James Antisdel v. City of Oak Creek Police and Fire Commission
" procedure pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 62.13(5)(em) (1997-98)[3] to contest his reduction in rank from sergeant
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17340 - 2005-03-31

State v. Alvin M. Moore
. § 940.42 (2001-02),[3] and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Moore contests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24521 - 2006-04-25

[PDF] WI APP 81
as the Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Veterans Affairs, following his military service in Iraq, Scocos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84170 - 2014-09-15

Melvin Kempf v. Michael D. Lilek
did not use their cottage as much as they had previously. After Melvin sold his farming operation, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5055 - 2005-03-31