Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44601 - 44610 of 74812 for public records.
Search results 44601 - 44610 of 74812 for public records.
COURT OF APPEALS
with Aaron’s treatment record, and had consulted with other doctors about Aaron’s case. Singh testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135210 - 2015-02-17
with Aaron’s treatment record, and had consulted with other doctors about Aaron’s case. Singh testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135210 - 2015-02-17
COURT OF APPEALS
life;” (5) failing to present evidence of the victim’s criminal record at sentencing; and (6) failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33726 - 2008-08-12
life;” (5) failing to present evidence of the victim’s criminal record at sentencing; and (6) failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33726 - 2008-08-12
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
no-merit report, and following an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999093 - 2025-08-20
no-merit report, and following an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999093 - 2025-08-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
. It is not a part of the appellate record and Avery made no attempt to seek this court’s permission to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50733 - 2014-09-15
. It is not a part of the appellate record and Avery made no attempt to seek this court’s permission to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50733 - 2014-09-15
Thomas Jelinski v. Michael Barr
record includes several written items marked as Record Document 12 and entitled “Documents submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15473 - 2005-03-31
record includes several written items marked as Record Document 12 and entitled “Documents submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15473 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous if they are not supported by the record. Schreiber v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wis., 223 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83436 - 2012-06-06
erroneous if they are not supported by the record. Schreiber v. Physicians Ins. Co. of Wis., 223 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83436 - 2012-06-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
the sentencing hearing, the parties reviewed Mitchell’s substantial prior record in both Wisconsin and Illinois
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33035 - 2014-09-15
the sentencing hearing, the parties reviewed Mitchell’s substantial prior record in both Wisconsin and Illinois
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33035 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mark Taylor v. Daniel Bertrand
3 written record of witness testimony, the staff advocate stated that he talked to the requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15376 - 2017-09-21
3 written record of witness testimony, the staff advocate stated that he talked to the requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15376 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. A circuit court’s factual findings are clearly erroneous if they are not supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83436 - 2014-09-15
. A circuit court’s factual findings are clearly erroneous if they are not supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83436 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
because he could have raised this issue in his earlier Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion. The records show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50732 - 2010-06-07
because he could have raised this issue in his earlier Wis. Stat. § 974.06 motion. The records show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50732 - 2010-06-07