Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44611 - 44620 of 62336 for child support.
Search results 44611 - 44620 of 62336 for child support.
[PDF]
NOTICE
in reducing the fee award because (1) the record did not support the court’s determination; (2) the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55525 - 2014-09-15
in reducing the fee award because (1) the record did not support the court’s determination; (2) the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55525 - 2014-09-15
State v. Lynne Layber
. The record does not support the State’s argument. When Layber’s attorney argued to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13963 - 2005-03-31
. The record does not support the State’s argument. When Layber’s attorney argued to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13963 - 2005-03-31
Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. v. The Shelby Insurance Group
of the insurance contract in support of their respective positions. The dispute arises in the interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8131 - 2005-03-31
of the insurance contract in support of their respective positions. The dispute arises in the interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8131 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jose Nieves-Gonzalez
. California, 372 U.S. 353, 356-58 (1963). In support of the trial court’s decision, the State asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2895 - 2017-09-19
. California, 372 U.S. 353, 356-58 (1963). In support of the trial court’s decision, the State asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2895 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conclude that the “context … of the statute as a coherent whole” supports our interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252883 - 2020-01-28
conclude that the “context … of the statute as a coherent whole” supports our interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252883 - 2020-01-28
WI App 82 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2400 Complete Title of...
503. But, as we will discuss, the affidavits supporting summary judgment here are far more detailed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97397 - 2013-06-25
503. But, as we will discuss, the affidavits supporting summary judgment here are far more detailed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97397 - 2013-06-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as merely providing additional support for how the court in fact weighed intent-related factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010725 - 2025-09-18
as merely providing additional support for how the court in fact weighed intent-related factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010725 - 2025-09-18
COURT OF APPEALS
(ALJ) agreed, explaining in relevant part: In their brief in support of their motion, the petitioners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147002 - 2015-08-25
(ALJ) agreed, explaining in relevant part: In their brief in support of their motion, the petitioners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147002 - 2015-08-25
State v. Kenneth E. Hopkins
asserting that there was an outstanding warrant at the time the court finds does not support any finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4786 - 2005-03-31
asserting that there was an outstanding warrant at the time the court finds does not support any finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4786 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion was an “attempt[] to manipulate [the circuit court’s May 2011] order” to support his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208828 - 2018-03-05
motion was an “attempt[] to manipulate [the circuit court’s May 2011] order” to support his argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208828 - 2018-03-05