Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44631 - 44640 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 44631 - 44640 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
commenced this action by filing a complaint against the persons named in the caption of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251235 - 2019-12-12
commenced this action by filing a complaint against the persons named in the caption of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251235 - 2019-12-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to be a spent shell casing on the ground near Jones. He ordered Jones to his squad car and conducted a pat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=561821 - 2022-09-07
to be a spent shell casing on the ground near Jones. He ordered Jones to his squad car and conducted a pat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=561821 - 2022-09-07
State v. Thomas F. W.
under the facts of a particular case is a question of law that we review without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3292 - 2005-03-31
under the facts of a particular case is a question of law that we review without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3292 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
2008 WI App 32 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP919-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31233 - 2009-11-10
2008 WI App 32 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP919-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31233 - 2009-11-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. For the reasons
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903367 - 2025-01-22
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. For the reasons
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903367 - 2025-01-22
State v. Jimmy Thomas
remanded the case for resentencing because there was no specific proof that the adjournments were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9767 - 2005-03-31
remanded the case for resentencing because there was no specific proof that the adjournments were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9767 - 2005-03-31
Nielson Communications, Inc. v. Satcom, LLC
to reinstate the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 The facts and procedural background of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21174 - 2006-01-31
to reinstate the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 The facts and procedural background of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21174 - 2006-01-31
[PDF]
State v. Shermell G. Tabor
2005 WI APP 107 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17874 - 2017-09-21
2005 WI APP 107 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17874 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 As the circuit court stated at the hearing in this case, 1205 South Duluth Avenue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213610 - 2018-05-30
2 As the circuit court stated at the hearing in this case, 1205 South Duluth Avenue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213610 - 2018-05-30
State v. William Avery
, which would involve trying “the entire homicide case.” The court refused to allow a mini-trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16020 - 2005-03-31
, which would involve trying “the entire homicide case.” The court refused to allow a mini-trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16020 - 2005-03-31