Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44641 - 44650 of 74812 for public records.
Search results 44641 - 44650 of 74812 for public records.
[PDF]
State v. Frank E. Ratcliff
to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12991 - 2017-09-21
to the report. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12991 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315304 - 2020-12-16
so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=315304 - 2020-12-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a judgment of conviction. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159831 - 2017-09-21
a judgment of conviction. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159831 - 2017-09-21
Craig Langsdorf v. Michael Hoefferle
award: (1) the trial court erroneously used the hearsay rule, in violation of the business record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12384 - 2005-03-31
award: (1) the trial court erroneously used the hearsay rule, in violation of the business record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12384 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in part his request for the return of a security deposit. Based on our review of the briefs and record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724650 - 2023-11-07
in part his request for the return of a security deposit. Based on our review of the briefs and record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=724650 - 2023-11-07
State v. Jack R. Martinsen
attorney. The record before this court does not disclose the results of the plethysmograph or Galli’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2958 - 2005-03-31
attorney. The record before this court does not disclose the results of the plethysmograph or Galli’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2958 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431134 - 2021-09-28
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431134 - 2021-09-28
[PDF]
State v. Titus Graham
. Although Graham had no prior criminal record, the court stated: “The defendant has been found guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6687 - 2017-09-20
. Although Graham had no prior criminal record, the court stated: “The defendant has been found guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6687 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241182 - 2019-05-22
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241182 - 2019-05-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649301 - 2023-05-02
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649301 - 2023-05-02