Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44651 - 44660 of 74812 for public records.
Search results 44651 - 44660 of 74812 for public records.
[PDF]
Craig Langsdorf v. Michael Hoefferle
erroneously used the hearsay rule, in violation of the business record hearsay exception applied in Rennick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12384 - 2017-09-21
erroneously used the hearsay rule, in violation of the business record hearsay exception applied in Rennick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12384 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558449 - 2022-08-23
RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558449 - 2022-08-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431749 - 2021-09-28
independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431749 - 2021-09-28
State v. Donnie L.B.
exist. The State has supplemented the appellate record which reveals that Donnie’s placement has since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14382 - 2005-03-31
exist. The State has supplemented the appellate record which reveals that Donnie’s placement has since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14382 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
). We conducted an independent review of the record and summarily affirmed the conviction. Id. at 1-2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30040 - 2007-08-20
). We conducted an independent review of the record and summarily affirmed the conviction. Id. at 1-2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30040 - 2007-08-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 17, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
and his or her counsel, or searching the record “to shed light on the defendant’s understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27777 - 2007-01-16
and his or her counsel, or searching the record “to shed light on the defendant’s understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27777 - 2007-01-16
[PDF]
State v. Estella Marie Iddings
, and an independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11451 - 2017-09-19
, and an independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11451 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Stephen W. Jones v. Eleanor Swoboda
, is the record custodian at CCI. Jones commenced this action because he was dissatisfied with the response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9673 - 2017-09-19
, is the record custodian at CCI. Jones commenced this action because he was dissatisfied with the response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9673 - 2017-09-19
Stephen W. Jones v. Eleanor Swoboda
Swoboda, is the record custodian at CCI. Jones commenced this action because he was dissatisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9673 - 2005-03-31
Swoboda, is the record custodian at CCI. Jones commenced this action because he was dissatisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9673 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
and has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97968 - 2013-06-10
and has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97968 - 2013-06-10