Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44661 - 44670 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 44661 - 44670 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
2008 WI App 32 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP919-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31233 - 2009-11-10
2008 WI App 32 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP919-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31233 - 2009-11-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. For the reasons
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903367 - 2025-01-22
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. For the reasons
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=903367 - 2025-01-22
State v. Jimmy Thomas
remanded the case for resentencing because there was no specific proof that the adjournments were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9767 - 2005-03-31
remanded the case for resentencing because there was no specific proof that the adjournments were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9767 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2009-10) motions in two cases.[1] He additionally appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73446 - 2005-03-31
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2009-10) motions in two cases.[1] He additionally appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73446 - 2005-03-31
Nielson Communications, Inc. v. Satcom, LLC
to reinstate the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 The facts and procedural background of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21174 - 2006-01-31
to reinstate the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 The facts and procedural background of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21174 - 2006-01-31
Mary A. Klovers v. City of Beaver Dam
, certiorari review is confined to the record made before the board. Id. at ¶20. In the present case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3640 - 2005-03-31
, certiorari review is confined to the record made before the board. Id. at ¶20. In the present case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3640 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
requirements were reasonable under the facts of this case. We affirm. ¶2 The facts are not disputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71990 - 2011-10-11
requirements were reasonable under the facts of this case. We affirm. ¶2 The facts are not disputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71990 - 2011-10-11
COURT OF APPEALS
or not in this particular case it was a noise level that was unreasonable…. They only needed to have the tools which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66366 - 2011-06-22
or not in this particular case it was a noise level that was unreasonable…. They only needed to have the tools which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66366 - 2011-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS
) (Leonard I). The supreme court denied review in both cases. In December of 2003, Andre filed a Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50732 - 2005-03-31
) (Leonard I). The supreme court denied review in both cases. In December of 2003, Andre filed a Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50732 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Chad A. Demerath
filed a motion to dismiss the case because Marvin lacked probable cause to stop or arrest him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21124 - 2017-09-21
filed a motion to dismiss the case because Marvin lacked probable cause to stop or arrest him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21124 - 2017-09-21