Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44661 - 44670 of 51987 for legal separation.

[PDF] Jean Dix v. John Forrett
that the circuit court applied an incorrect legal standard to her motion for reconsideration. We need not decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5496 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
focus entirely on “whether the court had the legal foundation to move forward in the Confirmation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217670 - 2018-08-15

COURT OF APPEALS
Perjury is a specific legal term. It requires a person “under oath or affirmation” to orally make before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56911 - 2010-11-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The legal conclusions, however, as to whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160330 - 2017-09-21

State v. Yathzee D. Inman
to relief, the trial court may in the exercise of its legal discretion deny the motion without a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10404 - 2005-03-31

Michael Drennan v. Diane J. Iverson
to this testimony. Thus, the issue whether the facts fulfill a particular legal standard is a question of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13027 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the stop was reasonable, I reject this argument. ¶7 Criminal defendants are entitled to legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211869 - 2018-04-26

State v. Michael E. Williams
implicitly concedes, that the trial court weighed the evidence and, therefore, applied the wrong legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11062 - 2005-03-31

Ruth Ann Hackman v. First Bank Southeast of Lake Geneva, N.A.
created by contract or by a formal legal relationship, or when implied in law due to the factual situation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10952 - 2005-03-31

State v. Antione Hunter
with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.’” State v. Pharr, 115 Wis. 2d 334
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4482 - 2005-03-31