Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4471 - 4480 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 4471 - 4480 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
State v. Kenneth M. W.
de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's decision. Section 48.32(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9044 - 2005-03-31
de novo, owing no deference to the trial court's decision. Section 48.32(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9044 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Gary K. Augustine v. Douglas Makos
entered into is a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 264, 528 N.W.2d at 499. It is undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9983 - 2017-09-19
entered into is a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 264, 528 N.W.2d at 499. It is undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9983 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Town of Grand Chute v. Mark Harry Gabriel
, Gabriel appealed his municipal conviction to the circuit court without requesting a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12629 - 2017-09-21
, Gabriel appealed his municipal conviction to the circuit court without requesting a trial de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12629 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
court’s order “affirming the decision” of the Municipal Court, but in a de minimis error gives the wrong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26670 - 2014-09-15
court’s order “affirming the decision” of the Municipal Court, but in a de minimis error gives the wrong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26670 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
corpus relief is available to a petitioner is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Pozo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168990 - 2017-09-21
corpus relief is available to a petitioner is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Pozo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168990 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jason L. Wendler
principles to those facts presents questions of law, which we review de novo. State v. VanLaarhoven, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5739 - 2017-09-19
principles to those facts presents questions of law, which we review de novo. State v. VanLaarhoven, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5739 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
de novo. Id., ¶33. We consider whether that new factor justifies sentence modification under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183443 - 2017-09-21
de novo. Id., ¶33. We consider whether that new factor justifies sentence modification under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183443 - 2017-09-21
State v. Nancy R. Lamon
, and that our standard of review is de novo. See State v. Foster, 191 Wis. 2d 14, 23, 528 N.W.2d 22 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3395 - 2009-04-28
, and that our standard of review is de novo. See State v. Foster, 191 Wis. 2d 14, 23, 528 N.W.2d 22 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3395 - 2009-04-28
COURT OF APPEALS
provided at the plea hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶21. ¶3 A defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30958 - 2005-03-31
provided at the plea hearing is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶21. ¶3 A defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30958 - 2005-03-31
Horst W. Josellis v. Pace Industries, Inc.
if not clearly erroneous, and the conclusion of frivolousness reviewed de novo as a question of law. See Riley v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5274 - 2005-03-31
if not clearly erroneous, and the conclusion of frivolousness reviewed de novo as a question of law. See Riley v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5274 - 2005-03-31