Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4471 - 4480 of 17541 for ex.

COURT OF APPEALS
that certiorari review is appropriate. As we explained in State ex rel. Bruskewitz v. City of Madison, 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70007 - 2011-08-17

[PDF] State v. Harry L. Seymer
of first-degree sexual assault of a child following an investigation triggered by his ex-girlfriend’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17655 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Timothy B. Panknin
on several occasions. In State ex rel. Steffen v. Kraft, 619 N.E.2d 688 (Ohio 1993), a defendant sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12519 - 2017-09-21

2009 WI APP 112
forbids political subdivisions from regulating solar and wind energy systems. State ex rel. Numrich v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37593 - 2011-02-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to object to an ex parte discussion between the prosecutor and the circuit court about the proposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865648 - 2024-10-22

Karen M. Joyce v. Town of Tainter
State ex rel. Brighton Sq. Co. v. City of Madison, 178 Wis.2d 577, 584, 504 N.W.2d 436, 439 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15585 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
by affidavit or any testimony on the record that these were ex-employees. For all I know, they’re currently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87170 - 2014-09-15

State v. Timothy B. Panknin
occasions. In State ex rel. Steffen v. Kraft, 619 N.E.2d 688 (Ohio 1993), a defendant sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12519 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
). In addition, Edwards cannot challenge the revocation decision. See State ex rel. Cramer v. Court of Appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163025 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Thomas Tateoka v. City of Waukesha Board of Zoning Appeals
the zoning board is an administrative body, see State ex rel. Nagawicka Island Corp. v. City of Delafield
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12657 - 2017-09-21