Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4471 - 4480 of 65135 for or b.
Search results 4471 - 4480 of 65135 for or b.
State v. Paul R. Maxey
provisions of Wis. Stat. § 939.62(1)(b).[2] Based principally on the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s recent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5215 - 2005-03-31
provisions of Wis. Stat. § 939.62(1)(b).[2] Based principally on the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s recent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5215 - 2005-03-31
James Antisdel v. City of Oak Creek Police and Fire Commission
, an aggrieved person or the chief under par. (b), unless the board determines whether there is just cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13464 - 2005-03-31
, an aggrieved person or the chief under par. (b), unless the board determines whether there is just cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13464 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 45
(a)(3) and (4); SCR 20:1.15(b)(4m)b.;9 9 SCR 20:1.15
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50736 - 2014-09-15
(a)(3) and (4); SCR 20:1.15(b)(4m)b.;9 9 SCR 20:1.15
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50736 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
, Hammis violated SCR 20:8.4(b).[1] [COUNT TWO] By failing to timely notify OLR and the Clerk
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135152 - 2015-02-16
, Hammis violated SCR 20:8.4(b).[1] [COUNT TWO] By failing to timely notify OLR and the Clerk
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135152 - 2015-02-16
[PDF]
Frontsheet
)(a), a Class B misdemeanor; Possession of THC, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 961.41(3g)(e), an unclassified
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191126 - 2017-09-21
)(a), a Class B misdemeanor; Possession of THC, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 961.41(3g)(e), an unclassified
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191126 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
James Antisdel v. City of Oak Creek Police and Fire Commission
or the chief under par. (b), unless the board determines whether there is just cause, as described
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13464 - 2017-09-21
or the chief under par. (b), unless the board determines whether there is just cause, as described
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13464 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Cranberry Springs, Inc. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
for employee status not to apply to Stanley, Cranberry must satisfy the two-part test under § 108.02(12)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9422 - 2017-09-19
for employee status not to apply to Stanley, Cranberry must satisfy the two-part test under § 108.02(12)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9422 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 51.20(2)(b) and (c). More specifically on the last points, the affidavits included averments that E.K
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190584 - 2017-09-21
. § 51.20(2)(b) and (c). More specifically on the last points, the affidavits included averments that E.K
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190584 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of procedural fairness. See Monroe County DHS v. Kelli B., 2004 WI 48, ¶19, 271 Wis. 2d 51, 678 N.W.2d 831
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36247 - 2009-04-20
of procedural fairness. See Monroe County DHS v. Kelli B., 2004 WI 48, ¶19, 271 Wis. 2d 51, 678 N.W.2d 831
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36247 - 2009-04-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1d)(b) (2019-20) (defining the term “sex offense” to include a violation of WIS. STAT. § 940.225(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541215 - 2022-07-06
(1d)(b) (2019-20) (defining the term “sex offense” to include a violation of WIS. STAT. § 940.225(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=541215 - 2022-07-06