Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44701 - 44710 of 68468 for did.
Search results 44701 - 44710 of 68468 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
they had access to the room, and learned the bedroom did not have a lock. The investigators testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54641 - 2010-09-20
they had access to the room, and learned the bedroom did not have a lock. The investigators testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54641 - 2010-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court.” The court did not directly address that request. However, it ultimately upheld the result
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346190 - 2021-03-17
court.” The court did not directly address that request. However, it ultimately upheld the result
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346190 - 2021-03-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
activity,” the call did not amount to reasonable suspicion without some corroboration that criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88591 - 2014-09-15
activity,” the call did not amount to reasonable suspicion without some corroboration that criminal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88591 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Webster
. Webster next argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13369 - 2017-09-21
. Webster next argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion because it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13369 - 2017-09-21
Mark Kypke v. Atterbury
that a notice of claim did not convey the right to sue a state employee unless the notice identified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6270 - 2005-03-31
that a notice of claim did not convey the right to sue a state employee unless the notice identified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6270 - 2005-03-31
State v. Derrick Sandles
. ¶9 Because the trial court did not evince an intention to impose the minimum sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21257 - 2009-03-16
. ¶9 Because the trial court did not evince an intention to impose the minimum sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21257 - 2009-03-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Madsen’s attorney did not request any form of relief or further inquiry into the matter. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102975 - 2017-09-21
and Madsen’s attorney did not request any form of relief or further inquiry into the matter. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102975 - 2017-09-21
State v. Shelly L. Fisher
the sentence recommendation of the parties, and its failure to do so did not invalidate the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4326 - 2005-03-31
the sentence recommendation of the parties, and its failure to do so did not invalidate the plea agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4326 - 2005-03-31
Dennis A. Graham v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
that he would lose his job if he did not accept the buy-out offer. Graham described several past
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9215 - 2005-03-31
that he would lose his job if he did not accept the buy-out offer. Graham described several past
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9215 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Corey O. Mackin
of trustworthiness. ¶5 Although the trial court did not cite any law or explain the significance of its rulings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7592 - 2017-09-19
of trustworthiness. ¶5 Although the trial court did not cite any law or explain the significance of its rulings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7592 - 2017-09-19