Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44701 - 44710 of 58507 for speedy trial.

State v. William Gunderson
: (a) At the arraignment; (b) At trial; (c) During voir dire of the trial jury; (d) At any evidentiary hearing; (e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4983 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Security State Bank v. Dale J. Sechen
). The decision to confirm a foreclosure sale rests with the discretion of the trial court. Gumz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19919 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate issues. First, we have reviewed the trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212194 - 2018-04-30

State v. Howard L. Goodman
by an impartial judge stems from [the] fundamental right to a fair trial guaranteed by the due process clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5516 - 2005-03-31

State v. Howard L. Goodman
by an impartial judge stems from [the] fundamental right to a fair trial guaranteed by the due process clause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5515 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Mark Edwards Dietrich v. Connie Wildo
of office before assuming his duties, he was unable to locate it. The trial court ruled that (1) police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13227 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm. ¶2 Law enforcement made four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68377 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. The Trial Court erred by the prejudice nature of the Attorney and misappropriated the claim by depending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102464 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
pleas based on lack of jurisdiction, ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel, and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160862 - 2017-09-21

State v. Geoffrey Chapman
and Chapman appeals that denial on the same grounds he presented to the trial court. ¶5 Chapman’s main
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4333 - 2005-03-31