Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44711 - 44720 of 57333 for id.
Search results 44711 - 44720 of 57333 for id.
State v. Kevin L. C.
choices made after thorough investigation of the law and facts are virtually unchallengeable. Id. at 690
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5014 - 2005-03-31
choices made after thorough investigation of the law and facts are virtually unchallengeable. Id. at 690
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5014 - 2005-03-31
State v. Duane A. Earley
exercise of discretion standard. Id. ¶4 A manifest injustice exists if the defendant’s plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3616 - 2005-03-31
exercise of discretion standard. Id. ¶4 A manifest injustice exists if the defendant’s plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3616 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
cause, however, is a question for our independent review. Id. ¶9 Feldman raises two issues: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33177 - 2008-06-25
cause, however, is a question for our independent review. Id. ¶9 Feldman raises two issues: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33177 - 2008-06-25
Brown County Department of Family Services v. Gary S.
a guardian ad litem as counsel for the purposes of § 48.315(1)(b). Id., ¶41. We acknowledge, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20102 - 2005-10-31
a guardian ad litem as counsel for the purposes of § 48.315(1)(b). Id., ¶41. We acknowledge, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20102 - 2005-10-31
State v. Raymond A. Rosa
is satisfied the jury acting reasonably could be so convinced. Id. (citations omitted). Moreover, as stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7089 - 2005-03-31
is satisfied the jury acting reasonably could be so convinced. Id. (citations omitted). Moreover, as stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7089 - 2005-03-31
Glinder Drake v. Marcia E. Huber
as “the absence of malice.” Id. at 564, 531 N.W.2d at 624. We then concluded that there were no facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11569 - 2005-03-31
as “the absence of malice.” Id. at 564, 531 N.W.2d at 624. We then concluded that there were no facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11569 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald G. Fedler
concluded that the permit process was protective of both interests. Id. at 445, 283 N.W.2d at 450. We also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4448 - 2005-03-31
concluded that the permit process was protective of both interests. Id. at 445, 283 N.W.2d at 450. We also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4448 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Windell Carradine
is by the preponderance of the evidence. Id. at 29, 556 N.W.2d at 697. Under the Goodchild3 standard, "a prima facie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11440 - 2017-09-19
is by the preponderance of the evidence. Id. at 29, 556 N.W.2d at 697. Under the Goodchild3 standard, "a prima facie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11440 - 2017-09-19
Johnny Larry v. David H. Schwarz
to the statute's context, subject matter, history, and objective to determine the intent of the legislation." Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10253 - 2005-03-31
to the statute's context, subject matter, history, and objective to determine the intent of the legislation." Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10253 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
raises such facts, the [trial] court must hold an evidentiary hearing. Id. at 310; Nelson v. State, 54
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43579 - 2014-09-15
raises such facts, the [trial] court must hold an evidentiary hearing. Id. at 310; Nelson v. State, 54
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43579 - 2014-09-15