Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44721 - 44730 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 44721 - 44730 of 58340 for speedy trial.
State v. Kathleen A. Krogman
a ruling of Judge James L. Carlson, who presided at the bench trial in this case. In a prior appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14367 - 2005-03-31
a ruling of Judge James L. Carlson, who presided at the bench trial in this case. In a prior appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14367 - 2005-03-31
Milwaukee Police Association v. Nannette H. Hegerty
appeal the trial court’s determination that the City must remit to police officer Matthew Grauberger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7051 - 2005-03-31
appeal the trial court’s determination that the City must remit to police officer Matthew Grauberger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7051 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 10
The trial court declined to instruct the jury on informed consent. It limited the instructions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34998 - 2014-09-15
The trial court declined to instruct the jury on informed consent. It limited the instructions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34998 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Mark R. Norlander
On the first day of his jury trial, Norlander filed a “Motion in Limine to Exclude Irrelevant Profile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18379 - 2017-09-21
On the first day of his jury trial, Norlander filed a “Motion in Limine to Exclude Irrelevant Profile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18379 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for disobeying a trial court order prohibiting her from unilaterally encumbering a residence which was an asset
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30156 - 2007-09-04
for disobeying a trial court order prohibiting her from unilaterally encumbering a residence which was an asset
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30156 - 2007-09-04
[PDF]
State v. Scott E. Frye
that his arrest was illegal. The trial court 1 Wahl testified that, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10832 - 2017-09-20
that his arrest was illegal. The trial court 1 Wahl testified that, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10832 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 151
and participate on the person’s behalf in a trial or other proceeding under this chapter at which testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103972 - 2017-09-21
and participate on the person’s behalf in a trial or other proceeding under this chapter at which testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103972 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 112
in SCR 72.01(45) and (46), refers to exhibits that are submitted to the court during a trial or hearing
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88926 - 2014-09-15
in SCR 72.01(45) and (46), refers to exhibits that are submitted to the court during a trial or hearing
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88926 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
purse from her shopping cart. ¶6 At trial the State established that, less than an hour after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75584 - 2014-09-15
purse from her shopping cart. ¶6 At trial the State established that, less than an hour after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75584 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 110
of this case towards trial was significantly delayed. Eventually, on April 20, 2011, a hearing was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87140 - 2014-09-15
of this case towards trial was significantly delayed. Eventually, on April 20, 2011, a hearing was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87140 - 2014-09-15