Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44731 - 44740 of 82766 for simple case.
Search results 44731 - 44740 of 82766 for simple case.
COURT OF APPEALS
to the County’s current case because the court had dismissed the previous case without prejudice. Specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92698 - 2013-02-11
to the County’s current case because the court had dismissed the previous case without prejudice. Specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92698 - 2013-02-11
County of Jefferson v. Mark L. Guttenberg
found Guttenberg guilty of both offenses. He appeals the judgments of conviction in both cases, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12876 - 2007-02-20
found Guttenberg guilty of both offenses. He appeals the judgments of conviction in both cases, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12876 - 2007-02-20
[PDF]
State v. Andrae T. D'Acquisto
observed D’Acquisto “put an arrow into his quiver 4 and then put his bow and his quiver ... in a case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16118 - 2017-09-21
observed D’Acquisto “put an arrow into his quiver 4 and then put his bow and his quiver ... in a case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16118 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Donald W. Burchfield
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-0716-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15267 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 99-0716-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15267 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
intentionally entered a dwelling—in this case, the home of D.C. —without D.C.’s consent, with intent to steal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228851 - 2018-11-29
intentionally entered a dwelling—in this case, the home of D.C. —without D.C.’s consent, with intent to steal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228851 - 2018-11-29
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2015 WI 31 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP2780-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137812 - 2017-09-21
2015 WI 31 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2013AP2780-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137812 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bridget P.
testimony from both Bridget P. and a case worker, and subsequently determined, in an oral decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6963 - 2017-09-20
testimony from both Bridget P. and a case worker, and subsequently determined, in an oral decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6963 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Bridget P.
testimony from both Bridget P. and a case worker, and subsequently determined, in an oral decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6962 - 2017-09-20
testimony from both Bridget P. and a case worker, and subsequently determined, in an oral decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6962 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. However, the witness in the only case cited by Perner in support of his argument was granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107730 - 2017-09-21
. However, the witness in the only case cited by Perner in support of his argument was granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107730 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James R. Beckerson
for revocation. In this case, the court signed the order without indicating whether probation was extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7036 - 2017-09-20
for revocation. In this case, the court signed the order without indicating whether probation was extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7036 - 2017-09-20