Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44741 - 44750 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 44741 - 44750 of 58340 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
WI 112
in SCR 72.01(45) and (46), refers to exhibits that are submitted to the court during a trial or hearing
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88926 - 2014-09-15
in SCR 72.01(45) and (46), refers to exhibits that are submitted to the court during a trial or hearing
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88926 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Randall G. Horlacher v. Eau Claire County Board of Land Use Appeals
The Horlachers appealed the board’s decision to the trial court. The court affirmed the board’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4914 - 2017-09-19
The Horlachers appealed the board’s decision to the trial court. The court affirmed the board’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4914 - 2017-09-19
Halquist Stone Company, Inc. v. Town of Brothertown Planning and Zoning Committee
. In certiorari proceedings, we review the decision of the agency, not the trial court, see State ex rel. Whiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12029 - 2005-03-31
. In certiorari proceedings, we review the decision of the agency, not the trial court, see State ex rel. Whiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12029 - 2005-03-31
Waushara County v. Lisa K.
of this action. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order to that effect. ¶4 Both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2332 - 2005-03-31
of this action. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order to that effect. ¶4 Both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2332 - 2005-03-31
WI 112 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Notice This order is subject to further editing an...
72.01(45) and (46), refers to exhibits that are submitted to the court during a trial or hearing
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88926 - 2012-10-31
72.01(45) and (46), refers to exhibits that are submitted to the court during a trial or hearing
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88926 - 2012-10-31
[PDF]
State v. Jason J.C.
no authority under § 938.355(4m) to expunge the 1994 delinquency adjudications. The trial court agreed. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12425 - 2017-09-21
no authority under § 938.355(4m) to expunge the 1994 delinquency adjudications. The trial court agreed. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12425 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to nevertheless identify Wiley during a trial. ¶5 During the suppression hearing, the State brought out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90408 - 2012-12-10
to nevertheless identify Wiley during a trial. ¶5 During the suppression hearing, the State brought out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90408 - 2012-12-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
assault of a child charge, his convictions violate double jeopardy and the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27139 - 2014-09-15
assault of a child charge, his convictions violate double jeopardy and the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27139 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 10
of these options, as well as the risks and benefits of each. ¶6 The trial court declined to instruct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34998 - 2009-01-27
of these options, as well as the risks and benefits of each. ¶6 The trial court declined to instruct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34998 - 2009-01-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
probability exists that a different result would be reached at trial. Id., ¶25. When the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243054 - 2019-07-02
probability exists that a different result would be reached at trial. Id., ¶25. When the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243054 - 2019-07-02