Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4481 - 4490 of 18956 for inmates search.
Search results 4481 - 4490 of 18956 for inmates search.
State v. David J.M.
.[2] We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13881 - 2005-03-31
.[2] We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13881 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David J.M.
of the evidence.2 We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched. While Christensen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13881 - 2014-09-15
of the evidence.2 We next address David’s contention that he was unlawfully searched. While Christensen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13881 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jerry C.O.
if they could search him. According to the officers, he stated, “I don't care.” Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11213 - 2005-03-31
if they could search him. According to the officers, he stated, “I don't care.” Officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11213 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dwayne Williams
to suppress the fruits of the search, arguing that Montgomery lacked probable cause to believe he was carrying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11507 - 2005-03-31
to suppress the fruits of the search, arguing that Montgomery lacked probable cause to believe he was carrying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11507 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
discovered the baton in the course of a protective search of Howard’s person and vehicle. Howard argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30244 - 2007-09-12
discovered the baton in the course of a protective search of Howard’s person and vehicle. Howard argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30244 - 2007-09-12
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey L. Meyers
to §§ 161.41(1m)(h)1 and 939.05, STATS. Meyers contends that the warrantless search of the van he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8910 - 2017-09-19
to §§ 161.41(1m)(h)1 and 939.05, STATS. Meyers contends that the warrantless search of the van he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8910 - 2017-09-19
Orville Oney v. Leroy Nennig, Jr.
, searched Oney's house pursuant to a search warrant. Various items were seized during the search. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8220 - 2005-03-31
, searched Oney's house pursuant to a search warrant. Various items were seized during the search. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8220 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Orville Oney v. Leroy Nennig, Jr.
with another Sheboygan County sheriff's detective and a probation officer, searched Oney's house pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8220 - 2017-09-19
with another Sheboygan County sheriff's detective and a probation officer, searched Oney's house pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8220 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jeffrey L. Meyers
to a crime, contrary to §§ 161.41(1m)(h)1 and 939.05, Stats. Meyers contends that the warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8910 - 2005-03-31
to a crime, contrary to §§ 161.41(1m)(h)1 and 939.05, Stats. Meyers contends that the warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8910 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to an unlawful warrantless search. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 The facts as testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102150 - 2013-09-24
to an unlawful warrantless search. We disagree and affirm. ¶2 The facts as testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102150 - 2013-09-24