Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4481 - 4490 of 63933 for records/1000.
Search results 4481 - 4490 of 63933 for records/1000.
State v. Anthony Lee Tucker
for the denial of Tucker’s requests. ¶2 According to the appellate record, Tucker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6602 - 2005-03-31
for the denial of Tucker’s requests. ¶2 According to the appellate record, Tucker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6602 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was coerced and his sentence is excessive. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170539 - 2017-09-21
was coerced and his sentence is excessive. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170539 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his motion to reconstruct the record. He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60262 - 2011-02-22
an order denying his motion to reconstruct the record. He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60262 - 2011-02-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that No. 2019AP2023
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502022 - 2022-04-05
upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that No. 2019AP2023
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502022 - 2022-04-05
Charles Johnson v. Rogers Memorial Hospital, Inc.
pursue their claim, nor the defendants defend against it, without access to Charlotte’s medical records
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1244 - 2004-04-14
pursue their claim, nor the defendants defend against it, without access to Charlotte’s medical records
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1244 - 2004-04-14
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Phillip Ries
of the defendant. The defendant must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9620 - 2017-09-19
of the defendant. The defendant must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9620 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
appendix, filing a false appendix certification, citing to its appendix rather than the record, and filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32150 - 2008-03-19
appendix, filing a false appendix certification, citing to its appendix rather than the record, and filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32150 - 2008-03-19
State v. Christopher Phillip Ries
. The defendant must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9620 - 2013-04-01
. The defendant must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9620 - 2013-04-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
to its appendix rather than the record, and filing a late reply brief. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32150 - 2014-09-15
to its appendix rather than the record, and filing a late reply brief. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32150 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116859 - 2014-07-14
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable basis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116859 - 2014-07-14