Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4481 - 4490 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 4481 - 4490 of 58458 for speedy trial.
State v. Curtiss J. Swoboda
his conviction for first-degree sexual assault of a child, after a trial by jury. Before trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8274 - 2005-03-31
his conviction for first-degree sexual assault of a child, after a trial by jury. Before trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8274 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
convicting him after a jury trial of one count of battery, one count of disorderly conduct, and one count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244231 - 2019-07-24
convicting him after a jury trial of one count of battery, one count of disorderly conduct, and one count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244231 - 2019-07-24
[PDF]
Haselwander Bros., Inc. v. Allen D. Tainter
Bros., Inc., a real estate developer, appeals a judgment, after a trial to the court, that dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8715 - 2017-09-19
Bros., Inc., a real estate developer, appeals a judgment, after a trial to the court, that dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8715 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of the property. She argues: (1) she was entitled to a jury trial; (2) she is entitled to attorney fees under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42147 - 2005-04-13
of the property. She argues: (1) she was entitled to a jury trial; (2) she is entitled to attorney fees under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42147 - 2005-04-13
State v. Daniel E. La Fave
and voluntary because his trial counsel mistakenly informed him and he reasonably believed he could appeal two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8696 - 2005-03-31
and voluntary because his trial counsel mistakenly informed him and he reasonably believed he could appeal two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8696 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel E. La Fave
and voluntary because his trial counsel mistakenly informed him and he reasonably believed he could appeal two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8695 - 2005-03-31
and voluntary because his trial counsel mistakenly informed him and he reasonably believed he could appeal two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8695 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
filed post-trial challenges in the trial court. ¶3 In response to the Zagrzebskis’ motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85717 - 2012-07-30
filed post-trial challenges in the trial court. ¶3 In response to the Zagrzebskis’ motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85717 - 2012-07-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. And, as to each, the Zagrzebskis filed post-trial challenges in the trial court. ¶3 In response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85717 - 2014-09-15
. And, as to each, the Zagrzebskis filed post-trial challenges in the trial court. ¶3 In response
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85717 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. Robert Carr, Jr. appeals a judgment of conviction and an order of the trial court denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362040 - 2021-05-04
CURIAM. Robert Carr, Jr. appeals a judgment of conviction and an order of the trial court denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362040 - 2021-05-04
Richard J. Schwarten v. Leslie Smith
for the support of the parties’ two minor daughters. Smith contends that the trial court should have applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5461 - 2005-03-31
for the support of the parties’ two minor daughters. Smith contends that the trial court should have applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5461 - 2005-03-31