Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44821 - 44830 of 68758 for had.
Search results 44821 - 44830 of 68758 for had.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the recommitment order had expired, appointed counsel for S.A.M. filed a notice of appeal from the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=284520 - 2020-09-15
the recommitment order had expired, appointed counsel for S.A.M. filed a notice of appeal from the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=284520 - 2020-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for trial. Reasoning that defense counsel had been on the case for several months and that Delphie’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33118 - 2008-06-24
for trial. Reasoning that defense counsel had been on the case for several months and that Delphie’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33118 - 2008-06-24
[PDF]
SC Clerk-Ltr
. At the end of the term, the Court had 191 petitions for review pending. 2007-08 2006-07
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34017 - 2023-12-08
. At the end of the term, the Court had 191 petitions for review pending. 2007-08 2006-07
/sc/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34017 - 2023-12-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
continued over a course of years to perform the duties he had been assigned, and continued to accept his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107933 - 2017-09-21
continued over a course of years to perform the duties he had been assigned, and continued to accept his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107933 - 2017-09-21
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
were erroneous, and the Village was equitably estopped from enforcing the ordinances because he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6212 - 2005-03-31
were erroneous, and the Village was equitably estopped from enforcing the ordinances because he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6212 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
for trial. Reasoning that defense counsel had been on the case for several months and that Delphie’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33118 - 2014-09-15
for trial. Reasoning that defense counsel had been on the case for several months and that Delphie’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33118 - 2014-09-15
State v. Paul E. Magnuson
. At that time, after Rev. Clark had informed the program officer that he was no longer agreeable to having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13904 - 2005-03-31
. At that time, after Rev. Clark had informed the program officer that he was no longer agreeable to having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13904 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Schellhammer stated that he was standing on the sidewalk and had an unobstructed view of Grant from head to toe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91546 - 2013-01-14
Schellhammer stated that he was standing on the sidewalk and had an unobstructed view of Grant from head to toe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91546 - 2013-01-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
years old and had an income of approximately $105,000. Ann is approximately one year younger than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97423 - 2014-09-15
years old and had an income of approximately $105,000. Ann is approximately one year younger than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97423 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. At the time of the divorce, he was fifty-seven years old and had an income of approximately $105,000. Ann
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97423 - 2013-05-28
. At the time of the divorce, he was fifty-seven years old and had an income of approximately $105,000. Ann
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97423 - 2013-05-28