Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44831 - 44840 of 58506 for speedy trial.

State v. Jason J.C.
§ 938.355(4m) to expunge the 1994 delinquency adjudications. The trial court agreed. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12425 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
appeals.1 ¶8 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30897 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
was then fourteen years old, and forced her to engage in sex acts. ¶3 Prior to trial, the State moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100138 - 2013-07-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, Ph.D., a biomechanical engineer, from testifying as an expert at trial. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1022587 - 2025-10-14

[PDF] Michelle McCann v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Ins. Co.
for summary judgment using the same methodology as the trial court. See M & I First Nat'l Bank v. Episcopal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12059 - 2017-09-21

Eugene Makowka v. Kim Dobner
. First, she asserts that “the trial court abused its discretion by finding [her] in contempt despite
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25132 - 2006-05-16

Dale Marek v. David H. Schwarz
. § 940.225(2)(d) (1993–94) (second-degree sexual assault). On the first two counts, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24978 - 2006-05-01

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the trial court and we will affirm the court’s discretionary act if the trial court examined the relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149699 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶6 At trial to the court on July 29, 2014, Ganta asked the court for the return of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142162 - 2015-05-20

Patrick P. Fee v. Board of Review for the Town of Florence
of review under Reiss because they had improperly filled out the objection form. The trial court agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5434 - 2005-03-31