Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44841 - 44850 of 68499 for did.
Search results 44841 - 44850 of 68499 for did.
State v. Jeffrey Kuehl
of the other witnesses' motivation for testifying as they did; and that it was irrelevant whether Kuehl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8454 - 2005-03-31
of the other witnesses' motivation for testifying as they did; and that it was irrelevant whether Kuehl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8454 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to circumstances. The court further reasoned that, although Wing’s criminal history was minimal, it did involve
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162429 - 2017-09-21
to circumstances. The court further reasoned that, although Wing’s criminal history was minimal, it did involve
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162429 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the traffic stop. Thus, the circuit court did not err in denying Fenton’s suppression motion.3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866064 - 2024-10-23
the traffic stop. Thus, the circuit court did not err in denying Fenton’s suppression motion.3
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866064 - 2024-10-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
these observations, Ratzel placed Sauer under arrest. ¶5 At trial, Sauer argued that Ratzel did not stop him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34697 - 2014-09-15
these observations, Ratzel placed Sauer under arrest. ¶5 At trial, Sauer argued that Ratzel did not stop him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34697 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, arguing that the communications between counsel did not constitute an enforceable settlement agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207487 - 2018-01-25
, arguing that the communications between counsel did not constitute an enforceable settlement agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207487 - 2018-01-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
concluded that the complaint failed to state a claim under 28 CFR § 35.134 because the complaint did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752818 - 2024-01-18
concluded that the complaint failed to state a claim under 28 CFR § 35.134 because the complaint did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752818 - 2024-01-18
COURT OF APPEALS
while his operating privileges were revoked. The deputy testified that he did not know the vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143503 - 2015-06-24
while his operating privileges were revoked. The deputy testified that he did not know the vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143503 - 2015-06-24
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court as an oral request at the hearing to consider discovery disputes. Not only did Backus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141988 - 2015-05-19
the circuit court as an oral request at the hearing to consider discovery disputes. Not only did Backus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141988 - 2015-05-19
Robert Vines, Jr. v. Ken Sondalle
. The nonremoval of his shackles on February 21, 1996, did not pose an obvious increased risk. There was no known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12947 - 2005-03-31
. The nonremoval of his shackles on February 21, 1996, did not pose an obvious increased risk. There was no known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12947 - 2005-03-31
Leopoldo Balderas, Jr. v. City of Milwaukee
] The appellant did indicate that the cost of repairs based on insurance adjuster estimates also exceeded the 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15581 - 2005-03-31
] The appellant did indicate that the cost of repairs based on insurance adjuster estimates also exceeded the 50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15581 - 2005-03-31