Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44841 - 44850 of 74812 for public records.
Search results 44841 - 44850 of 74812 for public records.
State v. Jack R. Martinsen
attorney. The record before this court does not disclose the results of the plethysmograph or Galli’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2958 - 2005-03-31
attorney. The record before this court does not disclose the results of the plethysmograph or Galli’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2958 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431134 - 2021-09-28
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431134 - 2021-09-28
[PDF]
State v. Titus Graham
. Although Graham had no prior criminal record, the court stated: “The defendant has been found guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6687 - 2017-09-20
. Although Graham had no prior criminal record, the court stated: “The defendant has been found guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6687 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241182 - 2019-05-22
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241182 - 2019-05-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649301 - 2023-05-02
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649301 - 2023-05-02
[PDF]
Craig Langsdorf v. Michael Hoefferle
erroneously used the hearsay rule, in violation of the business record hearsay exception applied in Rennick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12384 - 2017-09-21
erroneously used the hearsay rule, in violation of the business record hearsay exception applied in Rennick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12384 - 2017-09-21
State v. Donnie L.B.
exist. The State has supplemented the appellate record which reveals that Donnie’s placement has since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14382 - 2005-03-31
exist. The State has supplemented the appellate record which reveals that Donnie’s placement has since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14382 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
). We conducted an independent review of the record and summarily affirmed the conviction. Id. at 1-2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30040 - 2007-08-20
). We conducted an independent review of the record and summarily affirmed the conviction. Id. at 1-2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30040 - 2007-08-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 17, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
and his or her counsel, or searching the record “to shed light on the defendant’s understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27777 - 2007-01-16
and his or her counsel, or searching the record “to shed light on the defendant’s understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27777 - 2007-01-16
[PDF]
State v. Estella Marie Iddings
, and an independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11451 - 2017-09-19
, and an independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11451 - 2017-09-19