Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44851 - 44860 of 98503 for court records search online.

[PDF] State v. Justin David Schwartz
the court finds substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record. (Emphasis added
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7220 - 2017-09-20

State v. Justin David Schwartz
on the record. Id. at 122-23. ¶12 In Borst, our supreme court wrestled with the question of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7220 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John F. Hernandez v. Patrick E. Behrndt
for there is no written decision from the court commissioner in the record. Behrndt supplies no copy of a written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3515 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
: For the reasons stated on the record, including but not limited to the Court’s comments that the Court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=294744 - 2020-10-09

John F. Hernandez v. Patrick E. Behrndt
decision from the court commissioner in the record. Behrndt supplies no copy of a written decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3515 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Ronnie P.
an [erroneous exercise] of discretion if the record shows that the trial court failed to exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15143 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97088 - 2014-09-15

CA Blank Order
] A circuit court must explain its reasons for imposing a particular sentence on the record. State v. Hall
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97088 - 2013-05-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in the record to doubt whether the circuit court actually did make such an assumption at the original hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83627 - 2014-09-15

Lynn P. Adrian v. Gary E. Immel
. See Evenson, 228 Wis. 2d at 687. The record demonstrates that the court examined the relevant facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2392 - 2005-09-01