Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44871 - 44880 of 68290 for law.

State v. Rick R. Rome
and was walking to her brother-in-law’s home. The woman insisted that she did not want any police assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2418 - 2005-03-31

State v. Michael Brandt
crimes, indicated the maximum penalty allowed by law, and asked for Brandt's plea. The circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17268 - 2005-03-31

State v. Vincent C. Lewis
of law and fact. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d at 127. Findings of fact will not be disturbed unless clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5598 - 2008-07-06

COURT OF APPEALS
, 2011 WI 79, ¶18, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 805 N.W.2d 334. This presents a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101361 - 2013-08-26

COURT OF APPEALS
). Whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60436 - 2011-03-01

State v. Walter T. Missouri
: On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the brief of Jeffrey W. Jensen of Law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21670 - 2006-04-25

Agribank, FCB v. Ronald Malueg
. A determination whether a mortgage contract is ambiguous is a question of law that we consider de novo. See Lamb
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8507 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
on the applicable law, and the facts are not disputed. We conclude that the officer had reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798590 - 2024-05-09

State v. Victor Spanbauer
: that the prosecutor did not establish his repeater status as required by law. The State has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12219 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Carl W. Rady v. Nancy Bergstrom
not participate. The motion was granted. Whether a complaint states a claim is a question of law this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10038 - 2017-09-19