Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44881 - 44890 of 68466 for did.
Search results 44881 - 44890 of 68466 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). The sentencing court considered appropriate factors, did not consider improper factors, and reached
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219129 - 2018-09-19
). The sentencing court considered appropriate factors, did not consider improper factors, and reached
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219129 - 2018-09-19
State v. Gwen L.P.
that the trial court applied improper statutory standards and that the evidence did not support the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10488 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court applied improper statutory standards and that the evidence did not support the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10488 - 2005-03-31
City of Wautoma v. Richard A. Wehe
that Sgt. Weiss did not have probable cause to arrest him for OMVWI. Whether a set of facts constitutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15050 - 2005-03-31
that Sgt. Weiss did not have probable cause to arrest him for OMVWI. Whether a set of facts constitutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15050 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, if filed after a direct appeal, unless the defendant shows a sufficient reason why he or she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35557 - 2009-02-17
, if filed after a direct appeal, unless the defendant shows a sufficient reason why he or she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35557 - 2009-02-17
COURT OF APPEALS
claims only that the circuit court did not explain the inadequacy of his complaint, denying him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138605 - 2015-03-30
claims only that the circuit court did not explain the inadequacy of his complaint, denying him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138605 - 2015-03-30
State v. Vickie L. Shipler
by § 346.65(2)(c). We conclude the trial court did not err, and accordingly, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2747 - 2005-03-31
by § 346.65(2)(c). We conclude the trial court did not err, and accordingly, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2747 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court could have reached but did not.” Noble v. Noble, 2005 WI App 227, ¶15, 287 Wis. 2d 699, 706 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756758 - 2024-01-30
court could have reached but did not.” Noble v. Noble, 2005 WI App 227, ¶15, 287 Wis. 2d 699, 706 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756758 - 2024-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
with Henk’s contention that Nationstar is not entitled to summary judgment because its attorney did not file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138244 - 2015-03-23
with Henk’s contention that Nationstar is not entitled to summary judgment because its attorney did not file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138244 - 2015-03-23
[PDF]
State v. Chester Gulan
claim that he did not actively participate in the murder or assault. Finally, he contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24516 - 2017-09-21
claim that he did not actively participate in the murder or assault. Finally, he contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24516 - 2017-09-21
Milwaukee Alarm Company, Inc. v. Felmers O. Chaney
not dispute the trial court's determination that the alarm-service agreement between it and Chaney did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12266 - 2005-03-31
not dispute the trial court's determination that the alarm-service agreement between it and Chaney did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12266 - 2005-03-31