Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4491 - 4500 of 29916 for des.
Search results 4491 - 4500 of 29916 for des.
2009 WI APP 156
a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. State v. List, 2004 WI App 230, ¶3, 277 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41541 - 2009-10-27
a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. State v. List, 2004 WI App 230, ¶3, 277 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41541 - 2009-10-27
State v. Larry M. Egleston
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶7 To collaterally attack a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26247 - 2006-08-16
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶7 To collaterally attack a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26247 - 2006-08-16
COURT OF APPEALS
Act. ¶7 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment, employing the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29517 - 2007-06-27
Act. ¶7 We review de novo a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment, employing the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29517 - 2007-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo.” State v. Kennedy, 2014 WI 132, ¶16, 359 Wis. 2d 454, 856 N.W.2d 834 (emphasis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=751591 - 2024-01-17
that we review de novo.” State v. Kennedy, 2014 WI 132, ¶16, 359 Wis. 2d 454, 856 N.W.2d 834 (emphasis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=751591 - 2024-01-17
City of Sheboygan v. Alonna L. Koenig
de novo. State v. Dean, 163 Wis. 2d 503, 510, 471 N.W.2d 310 (Ct. App. 1991). “The primary source
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6625 - 2005-03-31
de novo. State v. Dean, 163 Wis. 2d 503, 510, 471 N.W.2d 310 (Ct. App. 1991). “The primary source
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6625 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation, which are reviewed de novo. See Rogers v. Rogers, 2007 WI App 50, ¶7, 300 Wis. 2d 532, 731
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131221 - 2017-09-21
interpretation, which are reviewed de novo. See Rogers v. Rogers, 2007 WI App 50, ¶7, 300 Wis. 2d 532, 731
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131221 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Banks Bros. Corporation v. Donovan Floors, Inc.
are not disputed. Accordingly, our review is de novo. See Thelen v. DHSS, 143 Wis. 2d 574, 577, 422 N.W.2d 146
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16258 - 2017-09-21
are not disputed. Accordingly, our review is de novo. See Thelen v. DHSS, 143 Wis. 2d 574, 577, 422 N.W.2d 146
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16258 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Trokan
, we review this question de novo. Id. at 97. ¶10 If the defendant has established a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6532 - 2017-09-19
, we review this question de novo. Id. at 97. ¶10 If the defendant has established a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6532 - 2017-09-19
John D. Lucin v. Ed B. Altmann
of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. See M&I First Nat’l Bank v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16094 - 2005-03-31
of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. See M&I First Nat’l Bank v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16094 - 2005-03-31
First National Bank v. Manfred Wernhart and Beth Wernhart
. Whether a duty exists in a particular case is a question of law the appellate court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10270 - 2005-03-31
. Whether a duty exists in a particular case is a question of law the appellate court decides de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10270 - 2005-03-31